Skip to content
River

Sheet RP-13Principle

Anti-fraud rules and KYC

How is a payment screened, and who decides on a doubtful one?

Screening is a stage of every payment. A score with its reasons and the unit’s rules decide whether a payment passes, waits for a person or is blocked; a person decides on what is held.

§ 1

In brief

A stage of every payment

Screening

a score with its reasons, and the unit’s rules

  • Passes

    the payment goes on to routing

  • Held

    a compliance officer releases or blocks it

  • Blocked

    by a rule; the reason is recorded

Across payments

Alerts

frequency, amounts near a threshold, geography

Before the first payment

Onboarding checks (KYB)

documents, owners, risk assessment, decision

Fig. 13.1 — screening and its three outcomes; alerts watch patterns across payments; onboarding checks a merchant before its first payment.
A score with reasons
The amount against the usual, the card’s country against the payer’s, frequency, a payer seen for the first time.
Held for a person
A compliance officer releases or blocks a held payment; the decision is recorded with its reason.
Alerts
Patterns across payments open an alert: amounts near a threshold, bursts, geography, funds that do not match an invoice.
Onboarding (KYB)
A merchant is taken on through a case: documents, owners, a risk assessment and a decision.

§ 2

In detail

2.1

The score and its reasons

Screening looks at signals and nothing else:

  • the amount against the merchant’s usual;
  • the payer’s country against the card’s, and blocked countries;
  • the number and the sum of attempts in a day;
  • a payer seen for the first time, the hour, the kind of business and the instrument;
  • the threshold for mandatory reporting.

It records a score with its reasons; a rule of the unit may then block the payment, hold it for a person or route it elsewhere. The facts of screening carry no payer’s name or address: in the demo a payer is a pseudonymous handle.

Demo scene 1

Screening on the demo stands

Payments screened, payments held for a person, and alerts opened, on both stands.

  • Screened

    5,696

  • Held for a person

    4

  • Alerts opened

    33

2.2

A person decides on a held payment

A held payment is released or blocked by a compliance officer; the decision is a fact with the role, the reason and the time, recorded where the automatic verdicts are. Nothing in the engine decides for the reviewer, and nothing that touches money or a person’s standing is left to an agent.

2.3

Alerts across payments

One payment is screened; a pattern is watched. Amounts at a reporting threshold, several payments just below it, bursts, geography, funds that do not match an invoice, a match on a sanctions list — each opens an alert with its evidence, assigned to a person and moved through investigation, escalation and report, with every note kept.

Demo scene 2

Alerts by kind and by reason

What monitoring opened across payments on both stands, and the reasons it gave.

KindAlerts
Unit rule12
Velocity7
Geography7
Threshold transaction4
Funds do not match1
Possible structuring1
Sanctions screening1
ReasonTimes
A unit’s rule matched25
Amount far above the merchant’s usual22
A payer seen for the first time21
Card issued in another country than the payer is in9
Many attempts by one payer in 24 hours7
A high-risk kind of business7

2.4

Onboarding a merchant

A provider that holds its merchants’ money takes each one on through a case: documents, a check of the company and its beneficial owners, a sanctions check, an assessment of risk, and a decision by a person — approved, sent back for more, or rejected.

Demo scene 3

Onboarding cases on the provider’s stand

The merchants’ cases of the payment provider’s stand, by status.

StatusCases
Open2
Sent back for more1
Approved2

§ 3

Read next